Since I created this post three years ago, a hearing took place on July 20, 2023, in Charleston County Family Court where my fiancé’s parenting rights were effectively stripped away, and still have not been restored.
It sounds like due process was never provided to protect the child's right to a relationship with her father, and her father's right to be with his daughter. I'm experiencing a similar situation in Washington state.
Here in Washington State with you. My relationship with my daughter was lost to Parental Alienation long ago. Experience taught me that to get real due process in family court takes a very large pile of cash and an attorney ready for a good court-room scrap. I did not experience the “mother is always right” attitude that the Washington courts are notorious for, but I did see the deft maneuvering of an alienator, her attorney willing to fight a deceitful cause, and a misandrous parenting evaluator.
Are you a military veteran or disabled? I'm slowly connecting threads from different stories and aiming to add transparency to the system's flaws and bad actors in the system. There is a non-profit in Duvall, WA called The Due Process Project that is working to update WA law to ensure due process is applied.
I live in Duvall, haven’t heard of them, will be checking them out. I did, however, make mention of that evaluator on this page’s website for reporting bad actors.
prepared to do the job they are tasked to do, regardless of whether it is an alienation case. And then, when it does come to cases of provable alienation, the courts, in their bewilderment of what must be going on, and consumed by a need to first protect themselves from issues of liability, too often take the easiest and safest (for themselves) way out.
What ends up happening is that courtroom personnel get drawn into gazing at the mirage of so called abuse, for example a father showing anger, while looking the other way and ignoring the real, identifiable abuse that is happening in plain sight. Perhaps it’s more exciting to corner a father with false allegations than to hold an alienating mother accountable.
I have also previously written about the failure of so many in that family court system to actually understand parenting, itself, and especially that mothers and fathers are culturally different in how they parent their children, leaving themselves jumping on the bandwagon of believing that a father is being abusive just because he expresses his anger.
I believe that such is not so much being ill-informed or ill-prepared but is intentional ignorance on the part of the family courts.
It sounds like due process was never provided to protect the child's right to a relationship with her father, and her father's right to be with his daughter. I'm experiencing a similar situation in Washington state.
Here in Washington State with you. My relationship with my daughter was lost to Parental Alienation long ago. Experience taught me that to get real due process in family court takes a very large pile of cash and an attorney ready for a good court-room scrap. I did not experience the “mother is always right” attitude that the Washington courts are notorious for, but I did see the deft maneuvering of an alienator, her attorney willing to fight a deceitful cause, and a misandrous parenting evaluator.
Are you a military veteran or disabled? I'm slowly connecting threads from different stories and aiming to add transparency to the system's flaws and bad actors in the system. There is a non-profit in Duvall, WA called The Due Process Project that is working to update WA law to ensure due process is applied.
I live in Duvall, haven’t heard of them, will be checking them out. I did, however, make mention of that evaluator on this page’s website for reporting bad actors.
https://www.thedueprocessproject.org/. The meeting times are when I phone my daughter so I may only attend remotely, if I can.
prepared to do the job they are tasked to do, regardless of whether it is an alienation case. And then, when it does come to cases of provable alienation, the courts, in their bewilderment of what must be going on, and consumed by a need to first protect themselves from issues of liability, too often take the easiest and safest (for themselves) way out.
What ends up happening is that courtroom personnel get drawn into gazing at the mirage of so called abuse, for example a father showing anger, while looking the other way and ignoring the real, identifiable abuse that is happening in plain sight. Perhaps it’s more exciting to corner a father with false allegations than to hold an alienating mother accountable.
I have also previously written about the failure of so many in that family court system to actually understand parenting, itself, and especially that mothers and fathers are culturally different in how they parent their children, leaving themselves jumping on the bandwagon of believing that a father is being abusive just because he expresses his anger.
I believe that such is not so much being ill-informed or ill-prepared but is intentional ignorance on the part of the family courts.